Site icon The Wildcat

China’s Mass Surveillance

In recent years, surveillance has become an enormous issue in the United States and the rest of the world. Why? Crime is a problem in the world because it is unpredictable. Most countries are conducting mass surveillance in secret. Just nine years ago, Americans realized that the NSA was performing mass surveillance: tapping into cell phones, laptops, etc. However, the United States is not the only country who has been doing this. Cuba, India, Iran, Bahrain, and China have performed mass surveillance in similar ways. However, in recent months, China took surveillance to the next level

Most countries tap into phone calls, texts, and emails. However, China’s “Big Brother” surveillance program is now spending billions of dollars on a facial recognition technology. Having 1.4 billion people in the country, it is hard to catch criminals and drug-dealers. With this new technology, the Chinese government has been able to look into a lot of private information:

 

 

Don’t let China’s new technology fool you to believe that it is going to make the country safer than it ever was. In a way, it is going to improve security but there are also flaws. The facial recognition is not perfect, it could only limit to the number of faces that it can scan. Also, the government said that it cannot use the system 24/7 because of the limitations of the technology. The system can be hacked and it is not as secure that it should be. The smart glasses cannot scan people that run or walk really fast. Only people that stand for a few seconds are able to be scanned.

However, China’s new technology is also one of the strongest and most advanced types of surveillance that is available in any type of government all around of the world. It has been able to stop 600,000 people who were fugitives, suspects, and drug dealers. The new technology scares the criminals into admitting their crimes. The monitoring and the uncertainty of the new technology make the people in the country more obedient.

China has used mass surveillance and spying more liberally than most countries in the world. In the United States, this type of technology would not be used because of our constitution and the foundation of our laws. These laws would be immoral and unethical according to the EU and the UN. That brings us to the question about if this technology is necessary. The devices do have its ups and downs but with terrorist attacks and murder going way over the top, the technology seems to be a necessity in most countries. Do the United States and the rest of the world have to change its laws and participate in these exaggerated practices? Do we need robots in airports and train stations? Do we need the government monitoring us every minute?

Exit mobile version